History: Cesar Chavez's History of Anti-Mexican Sentiment.

History: Cesar Chavez's History of Anti-Mexican Sentiment.

Cesar Chavez is probably best remembered as an incredible labor and civil rights leader. Along with the United Farm Workers; the union he helped found, he organized in innovative ways to lead a farm worker strike and grape boycott that brought California’s agriculture kings to their knees. 

During a massive farm worker strike that first started in 1965, farmers sought to bring in undocumented laborers from Mexico. Those laborers, who were strikebreakers, were often called “illegals” and “wetbacks” by strike supporters including by Cesar Chavez himself. Chavez himself was not an immigrant; his mother was brought to the United States as a newborn, and his father was born in Arizona. As someone who was born in the United States and saw the world as an American and not a Mexican, it was easy and convenient to see those "illegals" who's only desire was to provide for their families as inferior and a nuisance. 

Every city has a public library, a school, a park, or a boulevard with his name on it. Murals of Chavez are also extremely common. March 31st is actually now Cesar Chavez Day in California, meant to honor and remember his legacy. Chavez is the only Mexican American "hero" we were taught about in school, we were taught to celebrate and appreciate his achievements and sacrifices. Not knowing any better and thirsting for a leader or a hero to represent us, we ate it all up. 

In 2014 Cesar Chavez the movie was released by Panteleon and Lions Gate Films. It was directed and and produced by Mexican heavyweights Diego Luna and Gael Garcia Bernal. It starred big names such as Michael Peña, America Ferrera, and Rosario Dawson. I was actually pretty excited to go support it. I asked my dad if he would like to go see the movie with us and I was met with an angered response. "Que voy a andar yo viendo una pelicula de ese cabron!?, Pinche racista! Ese cabron le echaba la migra a la raza, no se porque le andan haciendo peliculas!" I was confused, I thought my dad was a supporter of Cesar Chavez since he had been a farm worker when he first emigrated to the United States in the 70's. The word "racista" paired up with the Cesar Chavez name did not make any sense. There was clearly something I didn't know. We asked my father in law if he would like to go see the Cesar Chavez movie with us and his response was almost identical to my dad's. So I did some research a few years ago and this is the most complete research that I found.  

The ugly truth is that Cesar Chavez was, in fact, deeply hostile toward “wetbacks,” as he (and many others of his time) called them. He was relentless in his efforts to halt immigration from Mexico and was active in pursuing the deportation of those already here. Chavez claimed that undocumented workers were driving down wages, and crucially, being used as strikebreakers. Mexican immigrants were routinely used to break strikes; their desperate situation often led them to take whatever work they could get, even if it meant clashing with the UFW’s goals.

What's disturbing about Chavez and the union’s actions is how firm and unwilling they were to consider that the issue was more complicated. Some Chican@ organizations and leaders cautioned Chavez that alienating undocumented workers was a disastrous mistake. Others complained that Chavez was making enemies of people who in fact were allies in this class and social struggle. Chavez's liberal allies and Chicano@ activists didn't agree with his tactics. But Chavez clung stubbornly to his beliefs, breaking ties with affiliated groups who wouldn't go along. His stubbornness resulted in fall outs, with some UFW field offices "refusing to cooperate" in tracking the undocumented workers. It is believed that Chavez's opposition to undocumented immigrants was a key factor in the 1970s decline of the UFW's power.

This is a repost of an article first published on March 31, 2013 in the blog End 1492 by its author, Pakal Hatuey and taken from the thinkmexican tumblr page.


We should take the time to take a close look at the organizing tactics and language used by Chavez and the UFW in the 1960’s and 1970’s to see if we really want to celebrate his legacy. In studying their newspaper El Malcriado from 1965 to 1972 we will see that the UFW, to a certain extent, had a working relationship with border patrol. That was because the UFW wanted border patrol to deport the Mexican migrant farm worker who crossed their picket lines. Another tactic used by the UFW, though not mentioned in El Malcriado was their ‘wetline’ tactic. This was a tactic where the UFW would go down to the U.S. and Mexican border to camp out and to notify border patrol where ever they had seen our people crossing the border “illegally”. In regards to the language used in El Malcriado, we see that woven into their articles is the racist term “wetback” (wb) and “illegal immigrants” to describe the Mexican migrants who were brought in some cases by the farm owners to do the work of the strikers. It is definitely shocking and upsetting to see some of the UFW’s leadership embrace racist stereotypes like "wetback" to describe our people. Some of this information might be common knowledge to academics, but to the majority of us Mexicans, Central Americans and beyond, these facts are brand new and extremely disturbing.

In the June 15th, 1968 volume II, number 8 page 16 of the El Malcriado newspaper there is an article titled “Union Vice President Speaks out : The Union and the Green Carder.” The Vice president was a “documented” Mexican named Julio Hernandez who was asked questions on the stand the UFW had against the Mexican migrant worker who crossed the picket line. One question that he is asked is “Why is the Union cooperating with the Immigration authorities to get Mexican citizens into trouble?” Hernandez responds, “The Immigration authorities have a responsibility to see that the regulations are enforced. Since there are reported to be many illegal green card and wetback scabs working for Giumarra (vineyards), we are cooperating with the authorities to have these illegal workers removed from the fields.” We can see that Hernandez as vice president of the UFW freely uses the derogatory term of "wetback" to describe our people. He further is pushing for border patrol to carry out their “responsibility” to deport the Mexican migrant and which in this case was a strikebreaker.

Another article from El Malcriado titled “Attention! Important Notice” written in May 15, 1968, before the interview with Julio Hernandez, it becomes apparent that the UFW had already began to take the names down of strike breakers to submit them to border patrol. In the article it stated that “Every day UFW is submitting lists of green card strikebreakers to the Immigration Service. The Union is keeping close tabs on every scab and on each man who is investigated to see that justice is done. If a man with a green card visa is working at Giumarra and he wishes to keep his green card and avoid deportation, he need only quit Giumarra and find other employment.” The article also mentions the names of more than forty Mexican migrant workers who were going to be deported thanks to the UFW.


This article shows how the UFW was cheering for border patrol to do their job, and how the UFW would assist by reporting “on the enforcement of this new rule.”


With the help of UFW co-founder Dolores Huerta, Chavez launched the "Illegals Campaign"Chavez had sent out a memorandum to all UFW entities announcing the beginning of a massive campaign to get the recent flood of illegals out of California. Chavez states, "We consider this campaign to be even more important than the strike, second only to the boycott. If we can get the illegals out of California, we will win the strike overnight…we expect all Union entities to cooperate to make it successful.” And so the campaign against “illegals” began in places like the San Joaquin Valley where “field offices tracked down illegals where they worked and lived” informing local INS (La Migra) officials. By “mid-July the union reported to the INS the addresses of more than 300 illegals in Arvin-Lamont, more than 500 in Delano, and more than 1,200 in Porterville. By mid-September, the Selma field office had reported 2,641 illegal alliens to the Fresno Border Patrol office, which, the union volunteers complained, resulted in the arrest and removal of only 195 people.

To most academics the actions of Chavez and the UFW is common knowledge. George Mariscal is a historian who documents the working relationship that Chavez and the UFW had with border patrol in his book Brown-Eyed Children of the Sun. He notes that the organizing tactics of the UFW were in opposition to the Chicano movement because the UFW advocated for strict immigration controls and a closed border policy

We should keep in mind what Epifanio Camacho, a former UFW member said. Camacho stated “By 1973, Chavez had established what came to be known publicly as the ‘Wet Line’ in the area of Yuma, Arizona. It consisted of a number of army tents along the border with a group of men in each tent. Chavez’s cousin, Manuel Chavez, was in charge of assisting the immigration agents in detaining whoever tried to cross the border into the U.S. illegally. If men like Chavez are the leaders defending the workers, what do we need enemies for?”(p. 46-47 in “The Autobiography of a Communist: Communists Are Made, Not Born”). Camacho could not be more correct in his description of Chavez and by extension the UFW. Bardacke also touches on the “wet line” and mentions that the “county, state, and federal officials gave the UFW a free hand in this wilderness. No judge’s order put any limit on what the union’s night patrol might do to people it caught, nor did Mexican authorities in the cities of San Luis, Sonora, or Mexicali provided any protection to those who tried to cross illegally. If you got picked up by the UFW, you were on your own.” (p. 495). What this meant was that if you were caught by UFW members trying to cross the border you would more thank likely be brutally beat and robbed of your processions.


Picture of Epifanio Camacho

What has been shared with you is information that is not common knowledge amongst most people outside of the institutions of the university. In reading El Malcriado, articles like “The Wetback Game”, “Wetbacks Flood California”, or “La Migra Shapes up…We Hope”, the reader can feel as if they are reading a newspaper belonging to a neo-Nazi or Minutemen organization. It is scary, extremely offensive and unacceptable when we realize that these articles were written by a newspaper that represented an organization that was supposed to be non-violent. Chavez and the UFW’s leadership approved and exercised tactics that only terrorized our communities by relying and pressuring immigration to deport Mexican migrants. The UFW can be respected for going to the border to speak with their brothers and sisters, and convincing them to not cross their picket lines and to honor their demands. But the UFW crossed a bigger line when they called on and submitted names and addresses to border patrol of migrants to be deported. And on top of that for their leadership to use "wetback" to describe Mexican migrants and to have articles in El Malcriado with that word included, shows that white supremacists come in brown skin as well.

Below are two articles that include the racist term "wetback" in its titles:

El Malcriado


El Malcriado, Friday November 15, 1968, Volume II, Number 18.


This article below has the word "wetback" being used in the text.

El Malcriado, Friday November 15, 1968, Volume II, Number 18.


In this article below Cesar Chavez is quoted how as a youth his family was terrified by “La Migra” but then goes on to admit how the UFW has given the names of “illegal strikebreakers” to Border Patrol. And is disappointed with border patrol for not taking action.


Below is the article where UFW vice president Julio Hernandez was interviewed by El Malcriado, where he uses the word "wetback" to describe our migrant workers. I have also typed out the article so you can read it all.


El Malcriado: The Voice of the Farm Worker

Saturday, June 15, 1968 Volume II, Number 8.

“Union Vice President Speaks Out: The Union and the Green Carder”

El Malcriado has received many questions from farm workers who want to know exactly what is the union’s policy toward “Green Card” worker, Mexican citizens working in this country with form 1-151 permits. El Malcriado presented some of these questions to UFWOC Vice President Julio Hernandez, who is a citizen of Mexico and works in the United States under a green card permit. Here are some of his observations.

Question: Is the United Farm Workers Union opposed to Mexican citizens working in the United States under a “Green Card” permit?

Hernandez: No, definately not. What the Union opposes is scabbing. There is a federal regulation which prohibits the importation of foreign workers for strike-breaking purposes.

I have a green card myself. and so do nearly half of our members. We welcome green card workers who come to work in California as honorable men, but when they come to break our strike, we have no choice but to do everything we can to get them out of Giumarra’s fields and the fields of other struck growers.

Question: Why is the Union cooperating with the Immigration authorities to get Mexican citizens into trouble?

Hernandez: The Immigration authorities have a responsibility to see that the regulations are enforced. Since there are reported to be many illegal green card and wetback scabs working for Giumarra, we are cooperating with the authorities to have these illegal workers removed from the fields.

Question: What happens to green card workers who continue to work for Giumarra?

Hernandez: After we have explained our cause and the laws to the workers, a few will continue to be scabs because of thier own personal greed or other reasons. We consider all farm workers, Anglo, Negro, Filipino, Mexican, to be our brothers. But a scab is a scab, regardless of his race or citizenship. The names of scabs will be turned over to the Department of Labor. We do not like to take this action against someone who should be our brother, but a man who breaks the strike has betrayed his brothers and all farm workers. He has declared war on us, and we must defend ourselves, our families, and our jobs.

Question: How does the Union help green carders?

Hernandez: Well, the most obvious way is through better wages, such as we have won at Schenely, DiGiorgio, and the other ranches where we have contracts. There are many green carders working there.
The Union helps Mexican citizens with immigration problems and helps them arrange to bring their families to this country. We help them on legal problems; we have notary publics to serve them; and we help them get driver licences. We provide assistance with tax returns and other peperwork. These and all the other benefits of Union membership are available to green carders on the same basis as any other members. We do not oppose immigration. We oppose scabbing.

Actually, the Union is the best friend the green carder has in this country. I think all green carders should join the Union. And all green carders working in Kern and Tulare Counties should come into the Union offices at 102 Albany (or 10913 Main St.) and find out how the Union can help you, and where it is legal to work.”

End interview.

I ended up asking my dad to tell me more about his experience with the UFW. He went on to tell me that in the 1970's when he first emigrated to the United States the UFW would bully and harass undocumented workers. In some cases when the workers pushed back they were assaulted and beat up by a gang of UFW representatives. They would call the cops and La Migra on Mexican workers as well. As my dad explained, he wasn't too sure or too concerned about the beef or drama the UFW had with the farmers (the employers), all he knew is that he was being offered a job and all he wanted to do was work, but it is exactly that what drove the UFW crazy. I asked my father in law to tell me more about his experience with the UFW and again, his experience mirrored that of my dad's.

Chavez was what you would call a typical nativist bigot, right-wing militia member, Trump supporter by today's standards and not the saint portrayed in children's stories about him.

Just to reiterate: this isn’t about questioning Chávez’s work as an organizer and leader for the farm workers in California. Those contributions are real and can’t be disputed. It is all of the dirty tactics and terrorizing of vulnerable immigrants that for some, puts his legacy into question.


Stern, R. (2014, March 28) Cesar Chavez's Rebid Opposition to Illegal Immigration Not Covered In New Movie. Retrieved From: https://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/cesar-chavezs-rabid-opposition-to-illegal-immigration-not-covered-in-new-movie-6643666.

Valladares, F .(2018, March 18) A Flawed Hero. Retrieved.From: https://medium.com/22westmag/a-flawed-hero-547cfea556bf.

Bogado, A. (2014, February 14) Yes, Cesar Chavez Called Strikebreakers Wetbacks. Retrieved From: https://www.colorlines.com/articles/yes-cesar-chavez-called-strikebreakers-wetbacks.

Navarrete Jr, R, (2018, March 29) Trumps Beliefs Often Mirror Cesar Chavez's. Retrieved From: https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/article207379324.html.

Bobadilla, E. (2014, June 13) Chavez, The UFW and the "Wetback" Problem. Retrieved From: https://humanrights.fhi.duke.edu/chavez-the-ufw-and-the-wetback-problem/.


  • OT

    This was an interesting and enlightening article. Too bad you lowered your credibility and tying yourself politically to the DNC slave plantation that you follow. Remember Dems were the racist foundations until they disguised themselves in the early 2000s with hollow Public relations that have obviously persuaded the easily persuaded. I’m not hating, rather still in disbelief words not actions, convince people.

  • ErnestDourf


  • Rogerlearf


  • Mars

    Great article until the end. You declaring he’s an equivalent to a Trump supporter when he clearly had ties with the DNC and the Kennedys. Looking at today’s president, your statement is clearly faulty when we are looking at a California governor that just vetoed AB616 despite UFW support.

  • Mars

    Great article until the end. You declaring he’s an equivalent to a Trump supporter when he clearly had ties with the DNC and the Kennedys. Looking at today’s president, your statement is clearly faulty when we are looking at a California governor that just vetoed AB616 despite UFW support.

Leave a comment